Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

e.Ziex

Turanza 6

7.7

R16 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Turanza 6

Number of tests

10

3

13

Best position

#2

Average position

6.0

3.7

6.2

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

104

34

225

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

74%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

75%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

62%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

65%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

74%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

71%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

78%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

79%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Turanza 6

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison