18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Number of tests
10
3
23
Best position
#2
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
104
34
188

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
63%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison