18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Kumho (59%). In this particular case, the Falken e.Ziex has a better rating of 90% compared to 74% of the Kumho Ecsta HS52. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2023 when was the Falken e.Ziex first tested.

Test Profile

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

10

3

Best position

#2

#2

Average position

6.0

3.7

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

104

34

Wet

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Comfort

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison