18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Today, we will be comparing two touring, summer tyres: the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Bridgestone Turanza T005. Both are recommended for their consistency and performance in various conditions. However, each tyre possesses unique features that set them apart.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52 is a successor to the popular HS51 model and holds a commendable site rating of 78%. According to Autoklub ČR and Autobild, the HS52 excels in dry braking and offers an excellent price to performance ratio. Despite its strengths, TyreReviews reports a few weaknesses including environmental balance, efficiency and sustainability. On comparing with others, it secured the 13th position among 19 tyres in Autoklub ČR and 8th among 50 tyres in ADAC. This model has been discontinued and is replaced by a newer tyre model.


On the other hand, the Bridgestone Turanza T005, manufactured in facilities across Europe, boasts an impressive site rating of 92%. This Bridgestone tyre stands out in tests, especially when it comes to rolling resistance and wet circle cornering. In addition, AutoBild praised its exceptional performance in terms of dry and wet braking, wet circle cornering and wet handling. Although TyreReviews.com 2023 noticed no particular weaknesses, autobild 2022 mentions a limited lifespan. On comparing with others, in Autoklub ČR, Turanza T005 secured the 3rd position out of 19 tyres, and in ADAC, it secured the 4th position out of 50 tyres.


In summary, both Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Bridgestone Turanza T005 delivered consistent performances, yet with some notable differences. While the Kumho tyre offers excellent dry braking and value for money, the Bridgestone tyre shined in terms of grip and handling, both on wet and dry surfaces. On the downside, Kumho falls short in environmental impact, and Bridgestone shows a limited lifespan.


All analysis considered, the comprehensive tests place Bridgestone Turanza T005 at a higher position overall, due to its superior ability, balance and definitely worth considering despite its lifespan limitation. However, if budget constraints are a factor, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 may be a commendable alternative.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
33
3
3
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
4.1
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
104
658
40
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison