18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Today, we will be comparing two touring, summer tyres: the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Bridgestone Turanza T005. Both are recommended for their consistency and performance in various conditions. However, each tyre possesses unique features that set them apart.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52 is a successor to the popular HS51 model and holds a commendable site rating of 78%. According to Autoklub ČR and Autobild, the HS52 excels in dry braking and offers an excellent price to performance ratio. Despite its strengths, TyreReviews reports a few weaknesses including environmental balance, efficiency and sustainability. On comparing with others, it secured the 13th position among 19 tyres in Autoklub ČR and 8th among 50 tyres in ADAC. This model has been discontinued and is replaced by a newer tyre model.


On the other hand, the Bridgestone Turanza T005, manufactured in facilities across Europe, boasts an impressive site rating of 92%. This Bridgestone tyre stands out in tests, especially when it comes to rolling resistance and wet circle cornering. In addition, AutoBild praised its exceptional performance in terms of dry and wet braking, wet circle cornering and wet handling. Although TyreReviews.com 2023 noticed no particular weaknesses, autobild 2022 mentions a limited lifespan. On comparing with others, in Autoklub ČR, Turanza T005 secured the 3rd position out of 19 tyres, and in ADAC, it secured the 4th position out of 50 tyres.


In summary, both Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Bridgestone Turanza T005 delivered consistent performances, yet with some notable differences. While the Kumho tyre offers excellent dry braking and value for money, the Bridgestone tyre shined in terms of grip and handling, both on wet and dry surfaces. On the downside, Kumho falls short in environmental impact, and Bridgestone shows a limited lifespan.


All analysis considered, the comprehensive tests place Bridgestone Turanza T005 at a higher position overall, due to its superior ability, balance and definitely worth considering despite its lifespan limitation. However, if budget constraints are a factor, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 may be a commendable alternative.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
10
33
14
3
Best position
#2
#1
#8
#2
Average position
6.0
4.1
13.4
3.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
104
658
153
40

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Wet performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison