18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk

Today, we will be comparing two touring, summer tyres: the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Bridgestone Turanza T005. Both are recommended for their consistency and performance in various conditions. However, each tyre possesses unique features that set them apart.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52 is a successor to the popular HS51 model and holds a commendable site rating of 78%. According to Autoklub ČR and Autobild, the HS52 excels in dry braking and offers an excellent price to performance ratio. Despite its strengths, TyreReviews reports a few weaknesses including environmental balance, efficiency and sustainability. On comparing with others, it secured the 13th position among 19 tyres in Autoklub ČR and 8th among 50 tyres in ADAC. This model has been discontinued and is replaced by a newer tyre model.


On the other hand, the Bridgestone Turanza T005, manufactured in facilities across Europe, boasts an impressive site rating of 92%. This Bridgestone tyre stands out in tests, especially when it comes to rolling resistance and wet circle cornering. In addition, AutoBild praised its exceptional performance in terms of dry and wet braking, wet circle cornering and wet handling. Although TyreReviews.com 2023 noticed no particular weaknesses, autobild 2022 mentions a limited lifespan. On comparing with others, in Autoklub ČR, Turanza T005 secured the 3rd position out of 19 tyres, and in ADAC, it secured the 4th position out of 50 tyres.


In summary, both Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Bridgestone Turanza T005 delivered consistent performances, yet with some notable differences. While the Kumho tyre offers excellent dry braking and value for money, the Bridgestone tyre shined in terms of grip and handling, both on wet and dry surfaces. On the downside, Kumho falls short in environmental impact, and Bridgestone shows a limited lifespan.


All analysis considered, the comprehensive tests place Bridgestone Turanza T005 at a higher position overall, due to its superior ability, balance and definitely worth considering despite its lifespan limitation. However, if budget constraints are a factor, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 may be a commendable alternative.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk
Number of tests
10
33
14
21
Best position
#2
#1
#8
#2
Average position
6.0
4.1
13.4
11.9
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2024
Available sizes
104
658
153
164

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Wet performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison