18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Also compare with
Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
10
14
3
26
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
3.6
3.3
2.2
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
104
188
40
66

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
45%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
35%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison