18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
14
3
Best position
#2
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
3.6
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
104
188
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison