18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. Hankook ION Evo

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Kumho (59%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS51 was done in 2016, compared to 2025 when was the Hankook ION Evo first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Kumho Ecsta HS51 has B wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Hankook ION Evo has A rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ecsta HS51 is made in China and ION Evo is made in Hungary.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS51
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
10
1
Best position
#1
#1
Average position
9.3
1.0
Latest test
2021
2025
Available sizes
98
64

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS51
69%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS51
97%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS51
71%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS51
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS51
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry driving behavior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
68%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS51
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS51
76%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS51
51%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Fuel efficiency
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS51
54%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison