18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. Falken e.Ziex

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Kumho (59%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS51 was done in 2016, compared to 2023 when was the Falken e.Ziex first tested. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ecsta HS51 is made in China and e.Ziex is made in Turkey.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS51
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
3
Best position
#1
#2
Average position
9.3
3.7
Latest test
2021
2025
Available sizes
98
34

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS51
97%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS51
71%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS51
69%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS51
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS51
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Kumho Ecsta HS51
96%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry driving behavior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
68%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS51
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS51
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS51
51%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Fuel efficiency
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS51
54%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison