18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Vredestein Quatrac vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

This comparison pits the Kleber Quadraxer 3 against the Vredestein Quatrac across the available tyre tests and reviews. Both are positioned as all-season / allround tyres, but the test results show clear differences in strengths and overall performance.


Quick facts: Kleber Quadraxer 3 — rating 82% (product page); Vredestein Quatrac — rating 94% (product page). Manufacturer pages: Kleber and Vredestein. Neither model is listed as replaced by a newer model in the provided data.


Test-summary and comparative positions


  • Across Autobild test runs (2022–2025) the Vredestein Quatrac consistently ranks higher (positions like 2nd, 5th) while the Kleber Quadraxer 3 typically finishes lower (4th, 7th in different test groups). Overall test scores favor the Vredestein.

  • Independent reviews (TyreReviews, Autobild series, TyreReviews.com 2023) repeatedly highlight Vredestein’s excellence in wet performance, aquaplaning resistance and low exterior noise. Kleber’s highlights are its snow capability, comfort and good dry braking.


Strengths — Vredestein Quatrac


  • Wet performance & aquaplaning: Multiple testers call the Quatrac a “Nässespezialist” with excellent aquaplaning reserves and strong wet handling and wet braking laps.

  • Balanced all-weather handling: Reviews praise short wet and dry braking distances, agile handling, direct steering and quiet rolling.

  • Top test positions and high overall score (94%): Reflects consistently strong results across different disciplines and test events.


Weaknesses — Vredestein Quatrac


  • Some reports note average wear / moderate lifespan and a slightly elevated rolling resistance compared with the very best in class.


Strengths — Kleber Quadraxer 3


  • Winter / snow performance: Frequently singled out for short braking distances on snow, reliable snow traction and confident snow handling.

  • Comfort and dry braking: Test notes highlight pleasant ride comfort and good dry braking performance.

  • Aquaplaning safety reserves: Several summaries mention strong longitudinal aquaplaning resistance.


Weaknesses — Kleber Quadraxer 3


  • Wet grip and handling: Recurrent criticism across reviews: understeer on wet roads, delayed steering response and longer wet braking distances compared with top competitors.

  • Lower overall rating (82%) and mid-table test positions compared with Vredestein indicate it is not as rounded a performer in mixed conditions.


Overall verdict
When you compare both tyres across the range of tests and reviews, the Vredestein Quatrac emerges as the better all-round choice for drivers prioritizing wet-weather safety, low noise and sharp handling. It takes higher test positions and scores consistently better in wet and mixed-condition evaluations. The Kleber Quadraxer 3 is an attractive option if snow performance, comfort and dry braking are your top priorities — it delivers strong winter traction and a comfortable ride, but falls behind in wet driving dynamics and overall test ranking.


If you prioritize balanced, top-tier all-season performance, choose Vredestein; if you need a winter-biased, comfortable tyre with strong snow credentials at a generally lower cost, consider Kleber.

Test Profile

Kleber
Quadraxer 3
Vredestein
Quatrac
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
13
16
14
Best position
#4
#1
#8
Average position
6.3
3.1
13.4
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
111
86
153

Wet

Wet
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
Vredestein Quatrac
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet braking
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Wet handling
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Vredestein Quatrac
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81%
Vredestein Quatrac
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Wet performance
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77%
Vredestein Quatrac
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%

Snow

Snow
Kleber Quadraxer 3
82%
Vredestein Quatrac
81%
Snow traction
Kleber Quadraxer 3
85%
Vredestein Quatrac
79%
Snow braking
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81%
Vredestein Quatrac
84%
Snow handling
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Vredestein Quatrac
83%
Snow cornering
Kleber Quadraxer 3
87%
Vredestein Quatrac
74%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry braking
Kleber Quadraxer 3
82%
Vredestein Quatrac
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Dry handling
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
Vredestein Quatrac
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Dry performance
Kleber Quadraxer 3
69%
Vredestein Quatrac
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Vredestein Quatrac
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Vredestein Quatrac
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Price/value
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Vredestein Quatrac
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Mileage
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Vredestein Quatrac
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Comfort
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Vredestein Quatrac
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Exterior noise
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison