Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Premium2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Vredestein Quatrac
Table of contents:
| # | Kleber Quadraxer 3
| Vredestein Quatrac
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
This comparison pits the Kleber Quadraxer 3 against the Vredestein Quatrac across the available tyre tests and reviews. Both are positioned as all-season / allround tyres, but the test results show clear differences in strengths and overall performance.
Quick facts: Kleber Quadraxer 3 — rating 82% (product page); Vredestein Quatrac — rating 94% (product page). Manufacturer pages: Kleber and Vredestein. Neither model is listed as replaced by a newer model in the provided data.
Test-summary and comparative positions
- Across Autobild test runs (2022–2025) the Vredestein Quatrac consistently ranks higher (positions like 2nd, 5th) while the Kleber Quadraxer 3 typically finishes lower (4th, 7th in different test groups). Overall test scores favor the Vredestein.
- Independent reviews (TyreReviews, Autobild series, TyreReviews.com 2023) repeatedly highlight Vredestein’s excellence in wet performance, aquaplaning resistance and low exterior noise. Kleber’s highlights are its snow capability, comfort and good dry braking.
Strengths — Vredestein Quatrac
- Wet performance & aquaplaning: Multiple testers call the Quatrac a “Nässespezialist” with excellent aquaplaning reserves and strong wet handling and wet braking laps.
- Balanced all-weather handling: Reviews praise short wet and dry braking distances, agile handling, direct steering and quiet rolling.
- Top test positions and high overall score (94%): Reflects consistently strong results across different disciplines and test events.
Weaknesses — Vredestein Quatrac
- Some reports note average wear / moderate lifespan and a slightly elevated rolling resistance compared with the very best in class.
Strengths — Kleber Quadraxer 3
- Winter / snow performance: Frequently singled out for short braking distances on snow, reliable snow traction and confident snow handling.
- Comfort and dry braking: Test notes highlight pleasant ride comfort and good dry braking performance.
- Aquaplaning safety reserves: Several summaries mention strong longitudinal aquaplaning resistance.
Weaknesses — Kleber Quadraxer 3
- Wet grip and handling: Recurrent criticism across reviews: understeer on wet roads, delayed steering response and longer wet braking distances compared with top competitors.
- Lower overall rating (82%) and mid-table test positions compared with Vredestein indicate it is not as rounded a performer in mixed conditions.
Overall verdict
When you compare both tyres across the range of tests and reviews, the Vredestein Quatrac emerges as the better all-round choice for drivers prioritizing wet-weather safety, low noise and sharp handling. It takes higher test positions and scores consistently better in wet and mixed-condition evaluations. The Kleber Quadraxer 3 is an attractive option if snow performance, comfort and dry braking are your top priorities — it delivers strong winter traction and a comfortable ride, but falls behind in wet driving dynamics and overall test ranking.
If you prioritize balanced, top-tier all-season performance, choose Vredestein; if you need a winter-biased, comfortable tyre with strong snow credentials at a generally lower cost, consider Kleber.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 10 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
10
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1 | 1 | ||||
| KLEBER Quadraxer 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 1 | 1 | ||||
| VREDESTEIN Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 1- | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | |||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2- | 2– | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | 39.3 | 47.9 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.3 | 43.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | 38.5 | 58.4 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.2 | 55.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | 38.3 | 48.5 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.3 | 45.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | 40,3 | 49,4 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 41,7 | 47,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
