18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

When comparing the Kleber Quadraxer 3 and the Michelin CrossClimate 2, the overall picture from multiple independent tyre tests is clear: both are strong all-round contenders, but they target slightly different priorities. Our aggregated ratings reflect this: Kleber 81% vs Michelin 92%.


Test summary and mutual positions
Across Autobild and TyreReviews results, the two tyres swap places depending on the test focus. In one Autobild test (15 tyres) the Kleber finished higher (4th) while the Michelin was 9th. In a larger Autobild comparison (37 tyres) the Michelin placed 4th and the Kleber 7th. Independent reviews (TyreReviews and TyreReviews.com) repeatedly highlight the Michelin as a test winner for overall performance, especially in dry braking and snow performance. In short: Kleber can outrun Michelin in specific scenarios (value and some snow/comfort aspects), but Michelin is the more consistent top performer across tests.


Strengths — Michelin CrossClimate 2


  • Exceptional overall performance: consistently top-ranking in independent tests and listed as a test winner.

  • Excellent dry braking and dynamic dry handling — one of the best in class.

  • Top-tier snow braking, snow traction and fast snow-handling lap times.

  • Low rolling resistance and pleasant ride comfort; good aquaplaning reserves.

  • High score for durability and mileage in several tests.


Link to manufacturer: Michelin.


Weaknesses — Michelin CrossClimate 2


  • Average wet braking and wet handling in some tests — competent but not class-leading on wet roads.

  • Higher purchase price compared with many rivals.


Strengths — Kleber Quadraxer 3


  • Very good value-for-money with convincing driving behaviour on snow and ice.

  • Short dry braking distances and strong aquaplaning reserves reported in several tests.

  • Comfortable ride and low exterior noise are frequently praised.

  • Often highlighted for snow handling and snow braking — a winter-capable choice at lower cost.


Link to manufacturer: Kleber.


Weaknesses — Kleber Quadraxer 3


  • Tendency to understeer on dry and sometimes on wet roads; delayed steering response noted in tests.

  • Less consistent in overall rankings compared with premium all-rounders like the CrossClimate 2.


Verdict — which to pick?
If you want the most consistently high-performing all-round tyre with outstanding dry performance, low rolling resistance and top snow scores, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is the safer premium choice — reflected by its higher overall rating and multiple test wins. If you prioritise value, comfort and strong winter capability for a lower price, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 delivers excellent snow performance and good safety reserves, albeit with compromises in wet steering precision.


Note: Neither model in our data set has been replaced by a newer generation at the time of these tests.

Test Profile

Kleber
Quadraxer 3
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
13
24
3
1
Best position
#4
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.3
2.7
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
111
151
34
64

Wet

Wet
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet handling
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Snow

Snow
Kleber Quadraxer 3
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow handling
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow traction
Kleber Quadraxer 3
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow braking
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Snow cornering
Kleber Quadraxer 3
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Kleber Quadraxer 3
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Price/value
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Mileage
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison