18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2


The tyre comparison at hand is between the Kleber Quadraxer 2, produced in Poland, and the Vredestein Quatrac Pro manufactured in Hungary. Both are all-round tyres and were reviewed based on various tests and feedback.


Starting with the Kleber Quadraxer 2, this tyre is marked at a 33% rating on our scale. Known for its excellent grip in snowy conditions, it also stands out due to its high resistance to aquaplaning and its low internal noise. However, this tyre has some drawbacks. It has been noted to have low grip in wet and dry conditions, slow-reacting handling, and extended braking distances. Furthermore, it suffers from high rolling resistance. Despite this, Kleber provides a newer model, the Kleber Quadraxer 3, that replaced the Quadraxer 2 offering improvements on these fronts.


On the other hand, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro bears a competitive rating of 61%. It excels in wet conditions, offering the best wet grip in the tests, short wet braking distances, and fast wet handling laps. It also scores for its low internal noise. However, like the Quadraxer 2, it doesn't perform well in snow and dry conditions, has a low aquaplaning resistance, and the highest rolling resistance in the test. Yet, there are no direct replacements for this tyre, so Vredestein customers have to stick with this model.


When it comes to tests conducted by Tyre Reviews and Autobild, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro consistently outperformed Kleber Quadraxer 2. In the Autobild test featuring 31 tyres, the Quatrac Pro succeeded in securing the third position, displaying more efficient noise exterior, comfort, wet braking, wet circle cornering, and wet handling, and snow traction compared to the Quadraxer 2 which lagged at position 19. However, Kleber Quadraxer 2 makes up with its impressive grip performance in snowy conditions.


In summary, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro is the more capable tyre for an all-round performance in wet conditions and comfort. However, the Kleber Quadraxer 2 might be a preferred option for those who often drive in snowy climates. Both tyres, however, could benefit from improvements in certain areas, such as snow grip for the Quatrac Pro and wet and dry grip for the Quadraxer 2.

Test Profile

Kleber
Quadraxer 2
Vredestein
Quatrac Pro
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Number of tests
8
12
49
24
Best position
#5
#2
#1
#1
Average position
12.6
5.2
3.2
2.7
Latest test
2022
2025
2024
2025
Available sizes
76
103
213
151

Wet

Wet
Kleber Quadraxer 2
71%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Quadraxer 2
78%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Wet braking
Kleber Quadraxer 2
66%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Quadraxer 2
66%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Wet handling
Kleber Quadraxer 2
76%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Quadraxer 2
60%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%

Snow

Snow
Kleber Quadraxer 2
95%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow handling
Kleber Quadraxer 2
95%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow traction
Kleber Quadraxer 2
95%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow braking
Kleber Quadraxer 2
96%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Snow cornering
Kleber Quadraxer 2
96%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Quadraxer 2
79%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Quadraxer 2
77%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Price/value
Kleber Quadraxer 2
88%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Mileage
Kleber Quadraxer 2
77%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Quadraxer 2
74%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Dry braking
Kleber Quadraxer 2
72%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Dry handling
Kleber Quadraxer 2
77%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Quadraxer 2
92%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Exterior noise
Kleber Quadraxer 2
92%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Comfort
Kleber Quadraxer 2
78%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison