Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kleber

Quadraxer 2

R13 – R20

VS

Premium

Vredestein

Quatrac Pro EV

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Quadraxer 2

Quatrac Pro EV

e.Ziex

Number of tests

8

1

3

Best position

#5

#3

#2

Average position

12.6

3.0

3.7

Latest test

2022

2025

Available sizes

76

18

34

Wet

Kleber Quadraxer 2

71%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

64%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Quadraxer 2

78%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

57%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Kleber Quadraxer 2

66%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

61%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Kleber Quadraxer 2

76%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Quadraxer 2

66%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

61%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Snow

Kleber Quadraxer 2

95%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

62%

Costs

Kleber Quadraxer 2

79%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

74%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Quadraxer 2

77%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

74%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dry

Kleber Quadraxer 2

74%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

65%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kleber Quadraxer 2

72%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

61%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kleber Quadraxer 2

77%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

69%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Kleber Quadraxer 2

92%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kleber Quadraxer 2

92%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Quadraxer 2

Quatrac Pro EV

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison