18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kleber Quadraxer 2

Kleber

Quadraxer 2

VS

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Kleber

Quadraxer 2

Hankook

ION Evo

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

8

1

3

Best position

#5

#1

#2

Average position

12.6

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2022

2025

2025

Available sizes

76

64

34

Wet

Wet

Kleber Quadraxer 2

71%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Quadraxer 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Kleber Quadraxer 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Quadraxer 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Kleber Quadraxer 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Snow

Snow

Kleber Quadraxer 2

95%

Costs

Costs

Kleber Quadraxer 2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Quadraxer 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Comfort

Comfort

Kleber Quadraxer 2

92%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kleber Quadraxer 2

92%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Dry

Kleber Quadraxer 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kleber Quadraxer 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kleber Quadraxer 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison