Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Upper-middle

Kleber

Quadraxer 2

R13 – R20

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Quadraxer 2

e.Ziex

ION FlexClimate

Efficientgrip Performance 2

CrossClimate 2

Number of tests

8

3

1

3

24

Best position

#5

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

12.6

3.7

1.0

3.3

2.7

Latest test

2022

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

76

34

27

40

151

Wet

Kleber Quadraxer 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

Wet braking

Kleber Quadraxer 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Quadraxer 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Wet handling

Kleber Quadraxer 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Quadraxer 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

Wet circle cornering

Kleber Quadraxer 2

60%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

Snow

Kleber Quadraxer 2

95%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow braking

Kleber Quadraxer 2

96%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

90%

Snow handling

Kleber Quadraxer 2

95%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow traction

Kleber Quadraxer 2

95%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

76%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow cornering

Kleber Quadraxer 2

96%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

93%

Costs

Kleber Quadraxer 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Quadraxer 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Mileage

Kleber Quadraxer 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Price/value

Kleber Quadraxer 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

43%

Comfort

Kleber Quadraxer 2

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

Exterior noise

Kleber Quadraxer 2

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

Comfort

Kleber Quadraxer 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

83%

Dry

Kleber Quadraxer 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Dry braking

Kleber Quadraxer 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Dry handling

Kleber Quadraxer 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Quadraxer 2

e.Ziex

ION FlexClimate

Efficientgrip Performance 2

CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison