Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Upper-middle

Kleber

Quadraxer 2

R13 – R20

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

9.5

R16 – R20

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Quadraxer 2

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

8

3

2

Best position

#5

#2

#1

Average position

12.6

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2022

2025

Available sizes

76

34

23

Wet

Kleber Quadraxer 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Quadraxer 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet handling

Kleber Quadraxer 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Quadraxer 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet braking

Kleber Quadraxer 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Snow

Kleber Quadraxer 2

95%

Costs

Kleber Quadraxer 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Quadraxer 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Comfort

Kleber Quadraxer 2

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Kleber Quadraxer 2

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Dry

Kleber Quadraxer 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

Kleber Quadraxer 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

Kleber Quadraxer 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Quadraxer 2

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison