18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kleber
Quadraxer 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
8
26
3
Best position
#5
#1
#2
Average position
12.6
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2022
2026
2025
Available sizes
76
66
34

Wet

Wet
Kleber Quadraxer 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Quadraxer 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kleber Quadraxer 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Quadraxer 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Kleber Quadraxer 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Quadraxer 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Snow

Snow
Kleber Quadraxer 2
95%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Quadraxer 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Quadraxer 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Price/value
Kleber Quadraxer 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Mileage
Kleber Quadraxer 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Quadraxer 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kleber Quadraxer 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kleber Quadraxer 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Quadraxer 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kleber Quadraxer 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison