Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Viking Protech NewGen vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Upper-middle

Kleber

Dynaxer UHP

VS

Protech NewGen

Ventus Evo

9.8

R17 – R22

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Dynaxer UHP

Protech NewGen

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

6

7

3

Best position

#13

#16

#2

Average position

16.0

32.7

3.3

Latest test

2023

2026

Available sizes

44

92

60

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer UHP

62%

Viking Protech NewGen

57%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Dynaxer UHP

60%

Viking Protech NewGen

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Dynaxer UHP

72%

Viking Protech NewGen

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer UHP

62%

Viking Protech NewGen

33%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer UHP

60%

Viking Protech NewGen

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet circle cornering

Kleber Dynaxer UHP

61%

Viking Protech NewGen

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Costs

Kleber Dynaxer UHP

76%

Viking Protech NewGen

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Mileage

Kleber Dynaxer UHP

70%

Viking Protech NewGen

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Price/value

Kleber Dynaxer UHP

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Dynaxer UHP

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer UHP

77%

Viking Protech NewGen

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

Kleber Dynaxer UHP

85%

Viking Protech NewGen

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer UHP

72%

Viking Protech NewGen

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer UHP

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer UHP

72%

Viking Protech NewGen

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Viking Protech NewGen vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Dynaxer UHP

Protech NewGen

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison