18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

When comparing the Kleber Dynaxer UHP and the Kumho Ecsta PS71, it is clear that each has its own strengths and weaknesses. Both models are designed for summer driving, which means they perform optimally in warm, dry conditions.


The Kleber Dynaxer UHP stands out for its quiet exterior noise, a feature that makes driving more comfortable and enjoyable. However, Autobild tests have revealed some potential issues. The tyre ranks 15 out of 53, with criticisms aimed at its moderate grip and limited aquaplaning reserves when driving in the wet. Despite this, it does offer good mileage and low rolling resistance, making it a cost-effective choice for long-term driving. In terms of our general rating, this model scores a 68%.


Kumho's Ecsta PS71, on the other hand, scored slightly better with a rating of 72%. In testing, this tyre demonstrated a balanced high performance potential with good handling characteristics, which contributed to its 18th place ranking out of 53. It also boasts short braking distances on both wet and dry surfaces and offers a fair price. However, this model does have a slightly higher exterior noise level.


In the Autobild 2023 trial, additional qualitative insights were shared. For Kleber Dynaxer UHP, its good mileage and quiet rolling noise were once again mentioned as key strengths. However, some drawbacks like mediocre grip and poor lateral control in wet conditions were reported. As for the Kumho Ecsta PS71, its fair price and high performance balanced with good handling qualities were accentuated, but it was also pointed out that it creates more driving noise.


Ultimately, the choice between the Kleber Dynaxer UHP and the Kumho Ecsta PS71 depends upon personal driving preferences and conditions. If peace and quiet are paramount and you mostly travel on dry roads, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP would be a solid choice. Otherwise, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 offers better overall performance, especially in wet conditions. Both the Kleber and the Kumho are quality tyre manufacturers with solid reputations, offering reliable and efficient products for all drivers..

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer UHP
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
6
15
3
Best position
#13
#2
#2
Average position
16.0
9.0
3.3
Latest test
2023
2025
2026
Available sizes
44
225
60

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison