18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer UHP
Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
6
1
15
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
16.0
1.0
9.0
Latest test
2023
2025
2025
Available sizes
44
64
225

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
62%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
60%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
62%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
60%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
76%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
70%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
80%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
70%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
85%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
69%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison