18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer UHP
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
2
3
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
16.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2023
2025
2025
Available sizes
44
23
34

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
46%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
70%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
70%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison