18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer UHP
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
6
26
1
Best position
#13
#1
#1
Average position
16.0
2.2
1.0
Latest test
2023
2026
2025
Available sizes
44
66
64

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison