18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer UHP
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
26
3
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
16.0
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2023
2026
2025
Available sizes
44
66
34

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
46%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison