Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Viking WinTech vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Upper-middle

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

VS

WinTech

Blizzak LM-005

8.2

R14 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Dynaxer HP4

WinTech

Blizzak LM-005

Number of tests

11

6

49

Best position

#1

#11

#1

Average position

11.6

20.8

3.2

Latest test

2024

Available sizes

121

59

213

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Viking WinTech

55%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Viking WinTech

46%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Viking WinTech

52%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Viking WinTech

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Viking WinTech

52%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Wet circle cornering

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Viking WinTech

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Viking WinTech

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Viking WinTech

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Viking WinTech

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Dry driving behavior

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

74%

Viking WinTech

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Dry performance

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Viking WinTech

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Viking WinTech

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Exterior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Viking WinTech

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

Viking WinTech

50%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Interior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

67%

Viking WinTech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

Costs

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Viking WinTech

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Mileage

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Viking WinTech

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Price/value

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

Fuel efficiency

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

89%

Viking WinTech

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Viking WinTech vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Dynaxer HP4

WinTech

Blizzak LM-005

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison