18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
11
4
3
1
Best position
#1
#3
#2
#1
Average position
11.6
12.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
121
111
34
64

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison