Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Dynaxer HP4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

11

3

4

1

3

Best position

#1

#2

#3

#1

#2

Average position

11.6

3.3

12.0

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

121

40

111

64

34

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet side guide

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Dynaxer HP4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison