Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Upper-middle

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Dynaxer HP4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

11

3

4

3

26

Best position

#1

#2

#3

#2

#1

Average position

11.6

3.3

12.0

3.7

2.2

Latest test

2024

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

121

40

111

34

66

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Wet circle cornering

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Wet side guide

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

100%

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Exterior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Costs

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Mileage

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Price/value

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Dynaxer HP4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison