Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Upper-middle

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

VS

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Test Profile

Dynaxer HP4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

EcoControl HP2

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

11

3

8

2

Best position

#1

#2

#4

#1

Average position

11.6

3.3

12.8

1.0

Latest test

2024

2026

2024

2025

Available sizes

121

40

30

23

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

63%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Wet circle cornering

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Costs

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

82%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Fulda EcoControl HP2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Dynaxer HP4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

EcoControl HP2

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison