18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Number of tests
11
16
4
2
18
Best position
#1
#3
#3
#1
#1
Average position
11.6
5.5
12.0
1.0
6.1
Latest test
2024
2023
2025
2025
2024
Available sizes
121
153
111
23
47

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Wet side guide
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison