Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Hankook ION Evo

Upper-middle

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

VS

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Dynaxer HP4

Efficient Grip Performance

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 4+

ION Evo

Number of tests

11

16

3

13

1

Best position

#1

#3

#2

#1

Average position

11.6

5.5

3.3

4.3

1.0

Latest test

2024

2023

2026

2025

Available sizes

121

153

40

123

64

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet circle cornering

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry driving behavior

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Interior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Michelin Primacy 4+

85%

Costs

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Mileage

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin Primacy 4+

91%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin Primacy 4+

82%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Hankook ION Evo

Dynaxer HP4

Efficient Grip Performance

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 4+

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison