18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
11
3
26
Best position
#1
#2
#1
Average position
11.6
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
121
34
66

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet side guide
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison