18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Debica Presto HP2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

In the world of summer tyres, two brands worth mentioning are the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and the Debica Presto HP2. Both from reputable manufacturers Kleber and Debica, they offer distinctive characteristics setting them apart in the market.


The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 is rated at 74% in our internal reviews. It came in 14th in the AutoBild test of 53 tyres, where it stood out for its comfort and exterior noise reduction. Additionally, the 2024 AutoBild highlight includes good environmental performance, operational life, and efficiency. However, there were weaknesses noticed with regard to stability on a wet surface. In another test carried out by ADAC, this model ranked 10 out of 18. It had good aquaplaning properties, short dry and wet braking distances, good comfort, and a quiet rolling noise in the AutoBild 2022 test. But it showed modest grip in wet conditions and delayed steering response.


On the other hand, the Debica Presto HP2 owned a rating of 70% from our review. Ranking 16th in the AutoBild test, it was appreciated for its price to value ratio. The 2024 AutoBild praised its environmental balance as well as resilience and efficiency. This tyre, however, presented deficiencies in safety when driving. The ADAC ranked it slightly better than the Kleber, taking 7th position out of 18 tyres tested.


In summary, both the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and the Debica Presto HP2 hold definite strengths and weaknesses. The Kleber tyre offers great comfort and noise reduction but has less grip on wet roads. The Debica, meanwhile, brings the best price-value ratio with good longevity and efficiency but needs overall improvement in driving safety.


Generally speaking, judging by our ratings and test results from reputable organizations like AutoBild and ADAC, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 might be a slightly better option provided you primarily drive in dry conditions. However, Debica Presto HP2 may be a suitable option for those looking for better value for money.


Furthermore, it is advisable to cross-check these tyres with respect to the conditions on which they will be used most frequently as well as your personal preferences and budget.

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Debica
Presto HP2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
11
5
15
Best position
#1
#4
#2
Average position
11.6
12.8
9.0
Latest test
2024
2024
2025
Available sizes
121
16
225

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Debica Presto HP2
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Debica Presto HP2
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Debica Presto HP2
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Debica Presto HP2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Debica Presto HP2
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Debica Presto HP2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Debica Presto HP2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Dry driving behavior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Debica Presto HP2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Debica Presto HP2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Debica Presto HP2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Debica Presto HP2
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Debica Presto HP2
96%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison