18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Cooper CS7 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Cooper
CS7
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
11
1
14
10
Best position
#1
#15
#8
#2
Average position
11.6
15.0
13.4
6.0
Latest test
2024
2022
2026
2026
Available sizes
121
71
153
104

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Cooper CS7
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Cooper CS7
58%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Cooper CS7
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Cooper CS7
36%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Cooper CS7
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Cooper CS7
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Cooper CS7
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Cooper CS7
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Cooper CS7
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison