Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Viking WinTech vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Upper-middle

Kleber

Dynaxer HP3

R14 – R19

VS

Budget

Viking

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Dynaxer HP3

WinTech

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Number of tests

6

49

23

Best position

#4

#11

#1

Average position

19.0

20.8

3.2

3.3

Latest test

2020

2024

2025

Available sizes

129

59

213

176

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

70%

Viking WinTech

55%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

80%

Viking WinTech

52%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Wet circle cornering

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

76%

Viking WinTech

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

58%

Viking WinTech

52%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

65%

Viking WinTech

46%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

73%

Viking WinTech

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

88%

Viking WinTech

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Dry driving behavior

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

81%

Viking WinTech

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Dry performance

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

77%

Viking WinTech

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

72%

Dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

83%

Viking WinTech

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

94%

Viking WinTech

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Costs

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

69%

Viking WinTech

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Mileage

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

81%

Viking WinTech

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Fuel efficiency

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

80%

Viking WinTech

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Price/value

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

58%

Viking WinTech

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Exterior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

57%

Viking WinTech

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Interior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

56%

Viking WinTech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Viking WinTech vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Dynaxer HP3

WinTech

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison