Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Kleber (59%). The first tyre test of Kleber Dynaxer HP3 was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Intensa UHP 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Dynaxer HP3 and the Intensa UHP 2 were tested.
| # | Kleber Dynaxer HP3
| Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 12.86
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Price/value
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3 | 37,7 | 44,69 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,3 | 38,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
