18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

Kleber

Dynaxer HP3

VS

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Kleber

Dynaxer HP3

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

6

10

3

Best position

#4

#2

#2

Average position

19.0

6.0

3.7

Latest test

2020

2026

2025

Available sizes

129

104

34

Wet

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

58%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

94%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Costs

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Comfort

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

58%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison