18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
6
5
3
1
Best position
#4
#1
#2
#1
Average position
19.0
2.2
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2020
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
129
63
34
64

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
57%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison