18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
6
8
10
Best position
#4
#4
#2
Average position
19.0
12.8
6.0
Latest test
2020
2024
2026
Available sizes
129
30
104

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
70%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
76%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
83%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
69%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
57%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Interior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
56%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison