Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Upper-middle

Kleber

Dynaxer HP3

R14 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

9.4

R16 – R20

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Dynaxer HP3

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Number of tests

6

3

4

Best position

#4

#2

#1

Average position

19.0

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2020

2025

2026

Available sizes

129

34

—

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

70%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

80%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Wet circle cornering

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

76%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

58%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

73%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

97%

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

88%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

94%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Costs

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

69%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Mileage

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

81%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

61%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

58%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Exterior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

57%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Dynaxer HP3

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison