18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
6
3
2
Best position
#4
#2
#1
Average position
19.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2020
2025
2025
Available sizes
129
34
23

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
70%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
76%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
73%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
57%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison