Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Kleber

Dynaxer HP3

R14 – R19

VS

Premium

Continental

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Dynaxer HP3

UltraContact NXT

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

6

2

4

3

Best position

#4

#1

#3

#2

Average position

19.0

1.0

12.0

3.3

Latest test

2020

2025

2026

Available sizes

129

23

111

40

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Wet circle cornering

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

58%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

94%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Costs

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Mileage

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Fuel efficiency

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

58%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Exterior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

57%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP3

UltraContact NXT

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison