18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Michelin e.Primacy

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Michelin
e.Primacy
Number of tests
6
2
4
Best position
#4
#1
#3
Average position
19.0
1.0
12.0
Latest test
2020
2025
2025
Available sizes
129
23
111

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
57%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison