Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kleber

Dynaxer HP3

R14 – R19

VS

Premium

Continental

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Dynaxer HP3

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Number of tests

6

2

3

Best position

#4

#1

#2

Average position

19.0

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2020

2025

Available sizes

129

23

34

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

58%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

94%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

81%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

58%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

57%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Dynaxer HP3

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison