18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Continental
UltraContact NXT
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
6
2
14
Best position
#4
#1
#8
Average position
19.0
1.0
13.4
Latest test
2020
2025
2026
Available sizes
129
23
153

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
57%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison