18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
14
3
Best position
#4
#8
#2
Average position
19.0
13.4
3.7
Latest test
2020
2026
2025
Available sizes
129
153
34

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
57%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison