18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Number of tests
6
1
10
Best position
#4
#6
#2
Average position
19.0
6.0
12.2
Latest test
2020
2018
2024
Available sizes
129
25
207

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
70%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
56%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
64%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
76%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
61%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
73%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
78%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
69%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
72%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
57%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
60%
Interior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
56%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison