Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kleber

Dynaxer HP3

R14 – R19

VS

Budget

Apollo

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Dynaxer HP3

Amazer 4G ECO

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

6

1

3

Best position

#4

#6

#2

Average position

19.0

6.0

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2020

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

129

25

40

34

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

70%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

65%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

76%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

80%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

58%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

73%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

88%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry driving behavior

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

81%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

69%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

81%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Fuel efficiency

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

80%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

58%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

57%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Interior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

56%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Dynaxer HP3

Amazer 4G ECO

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison