Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Kleber

Dynaxer HP3

R14 – R19

VS

Budget

Apollo

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Dynaxer HP3

Amazer 4G ECO

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

6

1

14

3

Best position

#4

#6

#8

#2

Average position

19.0

6.0

13.4

3.3

Latest test

2020

2018

2026

Available sizes

129

25

153

40

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

70%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

65%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Wet circle cornering

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

76%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

80%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

58%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

73%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Wet performance

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

62%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

88%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry driving behavior

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

81%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

94%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry performance

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Costs

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

69%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Mileage

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

81%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Fuel efficiency

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

80%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

93%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

58%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Exterior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

57%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Interior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

56%

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP3

Amazer 4G ECO

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison